Gives smaller states a security
USA in focus
Association of different countries
All NATO member states are puppets of the USA
Spending 900 billion euros per year on armaments
The most decisive advantage of NATO for me is the deterrent effect it has on other, non-NATO countries.
NATO's terms of accession call for civilian control of the military and respect for human rights.
The Nato possesses nuclear weapons
Combating international terrorism
one-sided view (western determined)
Alignment of interests
Its all a lie
Securing Peace as a Military Alliance is a Contradiction...
much better cooperation
Counterpart to the Warsaw Pact, which no longer exists. Justification for existence doubtful
Makes people feel safer
NATO was a counterpart to the Warsaw Pact. Since this alliance no longer exists since 1991, NATO is also pointless.
Defense and security
Too much bureaucracy/ Long decision-making processes
Complicates/impedes diplomatic solutions...
NATO is not the counterpart of the Warsaw Pact, but vice versa. Accordingly, it is not obliged to dissolve.
Only old white men
NATO has a much broader threat spectrum today than during the Cold War (e.g. worsening security situation in the Middle East + Africa).
No alignment of interests
Still deterrent potential
Child of the cold war
Most capable military alliance in the world
Confrontational course (example Crimea, Iraq) often brings negative results...
Secures peace without military action, solely through deterrence
NATO remains the only security guarantor for the Federal Republic of Germany
Is like the EU, only with USA and Canada
Community of values
concealed propaganda against the Eastern states such as Russia or China. Worsens the economy of others like by preventing Nordstream 2.
If the UN is unable to act in a critical situation due to the veto power of the permanent members - NATO acts anyway
I do not send my children to the front...
Helps promote the multilateral world order
Provides military protection and guarantees security
Allied Command Transformation (ACD) in the U.S. city of Norfolk, Virginia.
Saves us from near-death experiences
Does not involve the company and contains information outside them
Military assistance to member states
cumbersome decision-making and too much bureaucracy...
Stronger together - more resources for defense
are compulsively obliged to provide protection for each other
Reduction of the risk of attack
Acts without UN mandates - that is contrary to international law
For all opponents of NATO, what would we look like without them? You have forgotten that there is also war in this world and now also in Europe again.
Terrorist states like Israel and USA are under protection
Protection for Eastern Europe
The UN is a better institution than NATO because it incorporates the interests of more countries....
Can greatly advance medical research
Alone all the tanks and the military in Hamburg no country takes a stand on this and does not enlighten us
Helps with humanitarian crises
Germany spends more money on NATO defense than on its own Bundeswehr - Military alliance more important than national defense?
Illegal attack on Libya
Strong international statement
Imperialist-militarist alliance to secure Western neocolonial interests....
Oppression of various minorities
Has disgraced many states in the Orient than helped. Fight against terrorism means also fight against terrorist states!
No country can be oppressed in it